(With the inputs from PTI)
A recent academic study highlights how the excessive focus on global rankings within management education contributes to imperialistic tendencies of capitalism in the Global South, particularly India. Published in the journal Management Learning, the research critiques how such ranking-driven ambitions overshadow the creation of meaningful, locally relevant knowledge.
The study argues that many Indian management institutes pursue global recognition through rankings while simultaneously attempting to project a distinct national identity. This dual aim has led to a series of academic distortions, where the value of research is measured not by its social relevance, but by its publication in high-impact international journals.
Rankings, according to the study, create a perception of excellence confined to elite institutions. This focus neglects the need for improving academic ecosystems across the vast network of higher education institutes in the country. The pressure to publish in specific journals has also contributed to a rise in predatory publishing and the replication of Western academic models, which may not address local challenges effectively.
Furthermore, the research criticises the exploitative structure of academic publishing, where scholars invest considerable unpaid labour in writing, reviewing, and editing for corporate publishing entities, while job insecurity among faculty continues to grow.
The findings reveal a shift in academic priorities—away from inquiry and impact, towards recognition and ranking. The study recommends a reevaluation of academic norms within management education. It urges scholars to resist the dominance of ranking frameworks and instead engage in producing research that is context-sensitive and socially impactful.
